美陆军地面作战系统备件管理审计报告-92页.docx

《美陆军地面作战系统备件管理审计报告-92页.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《美陆军地面作战系统备件管理审计报告-92页.docx（6页珍藏版）》请在第一文库网上搜索。

1、(U) Army Tank-Automotive and Armaments CommandDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYUS. ARMY YANK AUTOMOTtVE ANO ARMAM1MTS COMMAHD6S01 EAST 11 MILE ROADDeTRofT ARSENAL. MCHBGAM 443974000AMTA-4R13 AUG nnMEMORANDUM THRUIntenial Review & Audit Compliance Office (AMIR), 4400 Martin Road. Redstone Arsenal. AL 356985000C

2、ommanding General. US Army Materiel Command (AMCG)1 4400 Martin Road, Redstone Arsenal. AL 35898-5000FOR Department of Defense, Office of Inspector General, 4800 Mark Center Drivet Alexandria. VA 22350-1500SUBJECT： Draft Report on the Audit of Defense Logistics Agency Storage and Care of Repair Part

3、s and Components for the Army Ground Combat Systems (Project No.D2022-DOOOAU-O139.0)1. Reference enclosed Department of Defense Office of Inspector General, memorandum (Draft Report on te Audft of Defense Logistics Agency Storage and Care f Repair Parts and Components for te Army Ground Combat Syste

4、ms (Project No. D2022-DOOOAU-O139.000). 27 July 2023.2. The U.S. Army Tank-automotive and Armaments Command (TACOM) reviewed the results in the enclosed subject draft report TACOM concurs ReeOmrTWndation 2. The official reply to the remmendation is CndOSed.3. The information in the draft report does

5、 not require Controlled Unclassified Information SecUnty markings.Encl MICHAEL B. LALORBrigadier General. USA Commandingr Ii7T(U) Army Tank-Automotive andArmaments Command (cont,d)U.S. Army Tank-automotive and Armaments CommandComments to the Department of Defense office of Inspector GeneraPs DraftR

6、eport Titled: Audit of the Defense Logistics Agency Storage and Care ofRepair Parts and Components for Army Ground Combat Systems(Project D2022-D000AU-0139.000)DOD OIG OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) properly stored and cared for repair parts and components for Arm

7、y Ground Combat Systems (GCS) in accordance with DoD Policies and guidelines.DOD OIG CONCLUSION: DLA Distribution officials did not store and care for Army GCS repair parts and components we reviewed in accordance with DoD policies and guidelines. Specifically, of the repair parts and components rev

8、iewed, valued at $1.96 billion, we identified that: 259,397 of the items valued at $1.31 billion (67 percent), had critical Care of Supplies in Storage (COSIS) deficiencies; 434,722 of the items, valued at $300.22 million (15 Percent), had major COSIS deficiencies; 185,224 of the items, valued at $1

9、92.72 million (10 percent), had minor COSIS deficiencies; and 130,530 of the items, valued at $158.54 million (8 percent), had no COSIS deficiencies.The improper storage and care of Army GCS repair parts and components occurred because the DLA did not have adequate guidance and training and the Army

10、 did not adequately oversee its materiel in DLA storage.As a result, Army GCS repair parts and components valued at $1.80 billion (92 percent), were deteriorating or at increased risk of deterioration. This includes $1.31 billion in GCS repair parts and components that were in immediate danger of de

11、grading. Furthermore, the improper storage and care of Army GCS repair parts and components created safety hazards that could result in injury to DLA personnel.ADDITIONAL FACTS: Regarding Table 4 (on report page 51), ILSC concurs the amount of potential monetary benefits could be up to $1,307,481,58

12、3 and that it could impact multiple Army appropriations.Page 1 of 3(U) Army Tank-Automotive andArmaments Command (cont,d)RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPLIES:For the Commander,U.S. Army Tank-automotive and Armaments CommandRecommendation 2: The Commanding General of TACOM should require materiel managers to:

13、a. Conduct periodic site visits and quality monitoring activities at DLA Distribution Centers to visually inspect their materiel to ensure that it is properly stored and cared for and to take appropriate corrective action when applicable.b. Periodically review whether all Army GCS material in DLA Di

14、stribution Centers have proper packaging and storage codes to prevent deterioration of materiel.c. Obtain and review Army Sustainment Command Packaging Storage and Containerization Center trip reports and coordinate with DLA Distribution Centers to ensure storage and packaging deficiencies are addre

15、ssed.d. Review unserviceable materiel in storage at DLA Distribution Centers to determine whether it is excess that could be disposed of or discontinue Care of Supplies in Storage Inspections.Command Reply: Concur. TACOM stakeholders will:a. Conduct quality monitoring activities to include TACOM ILS

16、C (Supply & Packaging) participation in Army Sustainment Commands (ASC,s) Packaging Storage and Containerization Center (PSCC) inspections/site-visits of DLA Distribution centers that store TACOM-owned stock, to include GCS assets. TACOM ILSC W川 also be contributing to PSCC,s analysis and reports. Due outs from the inspections will be tracked during the monthly AMC Storage Reform St